| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 1. |
MAP OF REGION |
|
|
|
|
| 2. |
WAS THE QUARANTINE AUTHORIZED USE OF FORCE?
SELF-DEFENSE? |
|
| |
2.1 |
Supportive commentators |
|
| |
- Editorial Comments (C. G.
Fenwick,B. MacChesney, M. S. McDougal" 57 Am. J. Int. L. 588 - 604 (1963).
- J. M. Raymond, "Legal
Implications of the Cuban Crisis" 3 Contemporary Law 126 - 134 (1963).
- L. Henkin, How Nations
Behave (1968) pp. 216 - 242.
- "Law and Conflict:
Changing Patterns and Contemporary Challenges" 57 Proceedings of the
American Society of International Law 9 - 17 (1963).
- A. Chayes, International
Crisis and the Role of Law (1974) pp. 41 - 68.
|
|
| |
2.2 |
Critical commentators |
|
| |
- J. S. Campbell, "The
Cuban Crisis and the UN Charter: An Analysis of the United States Position"
16 Stan. L. Rev. 160 - 176 (1963).
- C. Q. Christol,
"Maritime Quarantine: The Naval Interdiction of Offensive Weapons and
Associated Materiel to Cuba, 1962" 57 Am. J. Int. L. 526 - 565 (1963).
- W. L. Standard, "The
United States Quarantine of Cuba and the Rule of Law" 49 The Am. Bar Assoc.
J. 745 - 748 (1963).
- W. P. Gerberding,
"International Law and the Cuban Missile Crisis" in L. Scheinman and D.
Wilkinson (eds.), International Law and Political Crisis: An Analytic Casebook
(1968) pp. 175 - 210.
- "Nuclear Weapons, The
World Court and Global Security" 7 Transnat'l L. & Contemp. Probs. 459
- 486 (1997).
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
Required Reading |
|
| |
|
|
| |
- |
Editorial Comments (C. G.
Fenwick, B. MacChesney, M. S. McDougal) 57 Am. J. Int. L. 588 - 604
(1963). |
|
| |
- |
J. S. Campbell, "The Cuban
Crisis and the UN Charter: An Analysis of the United States Position" 16
Stan. L. Rev. 160 - 176 (1963). |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
Guiding Questions |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
1) What legal reasoning did
the United States rely upon? Which line of reasoning was suspiciously
absent?
|
|
| |
|
2) Was the quarantine an
il/legitimate "use of force?" A "threat of use of force?"
|
|
| |
|
3) To what extent was the UN
Charter relevant to the legality the U.S. action? Is there a customary law
("inherent" in international law but) outside the Charter that may be relevant?
|
|
| |
|
4) Did the Rio Treaty itself
violate the UN Charter by authorizing collective armed responses that were not
spelled out in Article 51? |
|
| |
|
|
|
|